Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Value | SBI Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI ValueValue | itself | UTI Value and SBI Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| SBI Large CapLarge Cap | SBI Large Cap and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios | itself | SBI Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 50% of their portfolios | SBI Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 33% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and SBI Large Cap share 50% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI Large Cap share 33% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 50% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Value | SBI Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | SBI Funds Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 37% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.79% points | 0.93% points | 1.06% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 47% | 59% | 53% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Saurabh Pant · ≥ 3 mo | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.1% | −1.6% | −3.3% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.1% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.0% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.2% | −15.4% | −15.8% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹55,417 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 41% | 57 · 47% | 76 · 48% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.