Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Value | Quant Multi Cap | Tata Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTI ValueValue | itself | UTI Value and Quant Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | Quant Multi Cap and UTI Value share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and HSBC Value share 7% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Quant Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and HSBC Value share 18% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Tata Value share 18% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and HSBC Value Fund share 30% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Value | Quant Multi Cap | Tata Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | quant Money Managers Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 37% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.79% points | 0.93% points | 1.15% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 47% | 88% | 81% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.1% | 4.9% | 0.2% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.1% | 10.5% | 12.9% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.0% | 11.7% | 13.3% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.2% | −25.3% | −20.9% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 6.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 41% | 74 · 53% | 41 · 52% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.