Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Axis Midcap | HSBC Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Axis Midcap share 14% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 24% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Axis Midcap share 16% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and HSBC Value share 22% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Value share 14% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 16% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Midcap and HSBC Value share 13% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 22% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Axis Midcap share 13% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Axis Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | Axis Midcap | HSBC Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Flexi Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 44% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.28% points | 1.36% points | 1.12% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 52% | 80% | 75% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | not known | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 3.8% | 6.9% | 2.4% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 16.2% | 17.1% | 15.9% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 15.0% | 13.5% | — | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −19.7% | −19.5% | −19.6% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹32,454 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 80 · 45% | 91 · 30% | 86 · 32% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.