Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Mirae Asset Midcap | Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Midcap share 17% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap | Mirae Asset Midcap and Nippon India Value share 17% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 4% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 24% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Mirae Asset Midcap | Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 41% of 51 | 83% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.55% points | 1.44% points | 0.83% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 89% | not measured | 58% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrs | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 9.1% | 4.8% | −5.4% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 16.4% | 18.1% | 11.5% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 15.8% | 16.8% | 13.5% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −22.5% | −20.9% | −14.0% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹20,000 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.1 yrs | — | 13 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 68 · 32% | none disclosed | 66 · 52% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.