Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Axis Midcap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Axis Midcap share 14% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Value share 14% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Midcap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and UTI Value share 10% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Axis Midcap share 24% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Axis Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Axis Midcap share 10% of their portfolios | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Axis Midcap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 44% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.36% points | 1.03% points | 1.17% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 80% | 108% | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 6.9% | 6.8% | −1.1% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 17.1% | 15.9% | 10.4% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 13.5% | 15.0% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −19.5% | −17.3% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹32,454 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 91 · 30% | 167 · 24% | 68 · 47% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.