Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Kotak Flexi Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | UTI Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Nippon India Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | UTI Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Tata Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Kotak Flexi Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | UTI Value | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Flexi Cap | Small Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 37% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.09% points | 2.00% points | 0.79% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | not measured | 68% | 47% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −1.6% | 10.4% | −4.1% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 11.5% | 25.3% | 12.1% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 10.6% | 20.0% | 11.0% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −16.3% | −22.8% | −17.2% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | — | 4.3 yrs | 12 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | none disclosed | 265 · 30% | 71 · 41% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.