Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 46% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 60% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Bandhan Value share 46% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 60% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and HDFC Value share 43% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 43% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 60% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Value | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.17% points | 0.83% points | 0.81% points | 1.07% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 68% | 58% | 45% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −1.1% | −5.4% | −5.3% | 5.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 10.4% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 10.9% | 13.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −17.9% | −14.0% | −15.4% | −18.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹80,822 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 13 yrs | 13 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 68 · 47% | 66 · 52% | 93 · 47% | 80 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.