Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 17% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 12% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and UTI Value share 43% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 17% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and UTI Value share 12% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 12% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 43% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Small Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.01% points | 0.70% points | 1.10% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 57% | 45% | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −4.7% | −3.2% | 8.9% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 11.1% | 9.1% | 16.1% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 12.8% | 10.6% | 19.0% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −15.4% | −16.4% | −24.2% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 13 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 14 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 69 · 45% | 50 · 53% | 257 · 16% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.