Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | HDFC Large Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | HDFC Large Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value | Tata Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 67% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 0.70% points | 1.62% points | 1.17% points | 1.15% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 45% | not measured | 68% | 81% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −3.2% | 4.2% | −1.1% | 0.2% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 9.1% | 17.3% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 10.6% | — | 12.8% | 13.3% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −16.4% | −21.0% | −17.9% | −20.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 1.8 yrs | — | 4.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 50 · 53% | none disclosed | 68 · 47% | 41 · 52% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.