Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Bandhan Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 3% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and HSBC Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Value share 3% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HDFC Value share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HSBC Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and HSBC Value share 29% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Bandhan Value share 29% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Bandhan Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.07% points | 1.37% points | 1.17% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 54% | 92% | 68% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 5.9% | −0.5% | −1.1% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 16.2% | 19.5% | 10.4% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 13.9% | 21.1% | 12.8% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −18.2% | −28.9% | −17.9% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 10 mo | 4.0 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 80 · 32% | 32 · 54% | 68 · 47% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.