Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Tata Value | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Tata Value share 17% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and UTI Value share 29% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Tata Value | Bandhan Value | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Value | Flexi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.15% points | 1.17% points | 1.28% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 81% | 68% | 52% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 0.2% | −1.1% | 3.8% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 12.9% | 10.4% | 16.2% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 13.3% | 12.8% | 15.0% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −20.9% | −17.9% | −19.7% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 11 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 41 · 52% | 68 · 47% | 80 · 45% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.