Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Tata Value | SBI MIDCAP | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Value share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Bandhan Value share 7% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and SBI MIDCAP share 7% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 45% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Tata Value | SBI MIDCAP | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.15% points | 1.09% points | 1.06% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 81% | 80% | 53% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 0.2% | 3.8% | −3.3% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 12.9% | 11.0% | 8.6% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 13.3% | 13.5% | 7.8% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −20.9% | −17.9% | −15.8% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 11 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 41 · 52% | 64 · 28% | 76 · 48% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.