Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | SBI MultiCap | HSBC Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 20% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI MultiCap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MultiCap share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI Value share 13% of their portfolios |
| SBI MultiCapMulti Cap | SBI MultiCap and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MultiCap and HSBC Value share 18% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and UTI Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and SBI MultiCap share 18% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios | UTI Value and SBI MultiCap share 19% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HSBC Value share 30% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | SBI MultiCap | HSBC Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 0% of 19 | 100% of 11 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 0.86% points | 1.00% points | 1.12% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 52% | 85% | 75% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Bectors Food · ≥ 3 mo | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 7.0% | −0.6% | 2.4% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 18.6% | 13.3% | 15.9% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 18.0% | — | — | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −19.9% | −15.1% | −19.6% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹24,138 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 14 yrs | 3.7 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 105 · 25% | 72 · 30% | 86 · 32% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.