Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MIDCAP | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Mirae Asset Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | itself | SBI MIDCAP and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 3% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 26% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Mirae Asset Midcap share 22% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and SBI MIDCAP share 3% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Midcap share 4% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 31% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 0% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 21% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap | Mirae Asset Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 22% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 4% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 21% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Midcap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MIDCAP | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Mirae Asset Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 38% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 41% of 51 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 0.83% points | 0.86% points | 1.37% points | 1.55% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | 58% | 52% | 92% | 89% |
| Run by P7 | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.8% | −5.4% | 7.0% | −0.5% | 9.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.0% | 11.5% | 18.6% | 19.5% | 16.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 13.5% | 18.0% | 21.1% | 15.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −14.0% | −19.9% | −28.9% | −22.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹20,000 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 13 yrs | 14 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 64 · 28% | 66 · 52% | 105 · 25% | 32 · 54% | 68 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.