Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MIDCAP | Tata Value | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | DSP Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 0% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 26% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and DSP Midcap share 20% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Tata Value and DSP Midcap share 14% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 0% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | itself | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 2% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and DSP Midcap share 5% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 2% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and DSP Midcap share 36% of their portfolios |
| DSP MidcapMid Cap | DSP Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 20% of their portfolios | DSP Midcap and Tata Value share 14% of their portfolios | DSP Midcap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 5% of their portfolios | DSP Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 36% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and DSP Midcap Fund share 36% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MIDCAP | Tata Value | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | DSP Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Flexi Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 38% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 91% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 43% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 1.15% points | 0.84% points | 0.86% points | 1.02% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | 81% | 29% | 52% | 56% |
| Run by P7 | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Vinit Sambre · ≥ 1.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.8% | 0.2% | −5.1% | 7.0% | 3.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.0% | 12.9% | 12.8% | 18.6% | 14.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 13.3% | 11.5% | 18.0% | 11.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −20.9% | −11.0% | −19.9% | −21.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹20,871 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 11 yrs | 5.0 yrs | 14 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 64 · 28% | 41 · 52% | 116 · 52% | 105 · 25% | 66 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.