Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Small Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Multi Cap share 30% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 8% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| HDFC Multi CapMulti Cap | HDFC Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 30% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 19% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | HDFC Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 23% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Small Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Small Cap | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 68% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 73% of 22 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.83% points | 1.10% points | 1.62% points | 1.30% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 58% | 68% | not measured | 79% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | not known | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.4% | 8.9% | 4.2% | −2.2% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 16.1% | 17.3% | 12.0% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 19.0% | — | — | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.0% | −24.2% | −21.0% | −20.2% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹20,765 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 14 yrs | — | 2.4 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 66 · 52% | 257 · 16% | none disclosed | 127 · 23% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.