Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 55% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 55% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 14% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 14% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI Value share 13% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 42% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 55% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 68% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.83% points | 1.06% points | 0.86% points | 1.17% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 58% | 53% | 52% | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.4% | −3.3% | 7.0% | −1.1% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 8.6% | 18.6% | 10.4% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 7.8% | 18.0% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.0% | −15.8% | −19.9% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 14 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 66 · 52% | 76 · 48% | 105 · 25% | 68 · 47% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.