Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Kotak Mid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 0% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and UTI Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 42% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | UTI Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Kotak Mid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 68% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.83% points | 1.44% points | 1.37% points | 1.17% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 58% | not measured | 92% | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | not known | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.4% | 4.8% | −0.5% | −1.1% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 18.1% | 19.5% | 10.4% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 16.8% | 21.1% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.0% | −20.9% | −28.9% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | — | 4.0 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 66 · 52% | none disclosed | 32 · 54% | 68 · 47% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.