Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HSBC Value share 27% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 43% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 12% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HDFC Large Cap and HSBC Value share 24% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and HSBC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 27% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and HDFC Large Cap share 24% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 43% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Value |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 68% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.83% points | 0.70% points | 0.86% points | 1.44% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 58% | 45% | 52% | not measured | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.4% | −3.2% | 7.0% | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 9.1% | 18.6% | 18.1% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 10.6% | 18.0% | 16.8% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.0% | −16.4% | −19.9% | −20.9% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 14 yrs | — | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 66 · 52% | 50 · 53% | 105 · 25% | none disclosed | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.