Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 43% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 29% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 29% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 38% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Multi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 55% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 38% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 55% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 55% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Nippon India Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value | Large Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 51% of 109 | 50% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 64% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.70% points | 0.84% points | 0.83% points | 0.82% points | 1.06% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 45% | 66% | 58% | 82% | 53% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.2% | −1.4% | −5.4% | −2.8% | −3.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 9.1% | 13.5% | 11.5% | 14.0% | 8.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 16.4% | 13.5% | 13.4% | 7.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.4% | −18.6% | −14.0% | −17.6% | −15.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.8 yrs | 14 yrs | 13 yrs | 12 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 50 · 53% | 123 · 29% | 66 · 52% | 94 · 36% | 76 · 48% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.