Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Value | Axis Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC ValueValue | itself | HDFC Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | Axis Large Cap and HDFC Value share 41% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and UTI Value share 41% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Value share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Axis Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Axis Large Cap share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and UTI Value Fund share 41% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Value | Axis Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 53% of 109 | 47% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.07% points | 1.21% points | 1.03% points | 0.82% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 73% | 108% | 82% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.9% | −3.2% | 6.8% | −2.8% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 9.2% | 15.9% | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.9% | 5.8% | 15.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −15.5% | −17.3% | −17.6% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 5.9 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 80 · 32% | 49 · 48% | 167 · 24% | 94 · 36% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.