Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Value | HDFC Large Cap | Axis Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC ValueValue | itself | HDFC Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 47% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 54% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | Axis Large Cap and HDFC Value share 41% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 54% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 71% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and UTI Value share 41% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Value share 47% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 71% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 41% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Axis Large Cap share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund share 71% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Value | HDFC Large Cap | Axis Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 53% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 47% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.07% points | 0.70% points | 1.21% points | 1.38% points | 0.82% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 45% | 73% | 40% | 82% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | not known | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.9% | −3.2% | −3.2% | −4.0% | −2.8% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 9.1% | 9.2% | 10.4% | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.9% | 10.6% | 5.8% | 9.0% | 13.4% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −16.4% | −15.5% | −14.8% | −17.6% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 1.8 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 4.8 yrs | 12 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 80 · 32% | 50 · 53% | 49 · 48% | 63 · 47% | 94 · 36% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.