Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Axis Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC ValueValue | itself | HDFC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 14% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI Value share 13% of their portfolios |
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | Axis Large Cap and HDFC Value share 41% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 58% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and UTI Value share 41% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 14% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 58% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Axis Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 58% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Axis Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 53% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 47% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.07% points | 0.86% points | 1.21% points | 1.06% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 52% | 73% | 53% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.9% | 7.0% | −3.2% | −3.3% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 18.6% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.9% | 18.0% | 5.8% | 7.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −19.9% | −15.5% | −15.8% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 14 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 80 · 32% | 105 · 25% | 49 · 48% | 76 · 48% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.