Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Kotak Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 12% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 24% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Tata Value share 12% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 0% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and UTI Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | Kotak Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | Kotak Flexi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Flexi Cap | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 42% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Flexi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Kotak Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Flexi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.37% points | 1.09% points | 0.83% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 92% | not measured | 58% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | −0.5% | −1.6% | −5.4% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 19.5% | 11.5% | 11.5% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 21.1% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −28.9% | −16.3% | −14.0% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹54,857 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 4.0 yrs | — | 13 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 32 · 54% | none disclosed | 66 · 52% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.