Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Axis Midcap | Kotak Multi Cap | UTI Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Axis Midcap share 14% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | Axis Midcap and Tata Value share 14% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Midcap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Axis Midcap and UTI Value share 10% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Axis Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Axis Midcap share 10% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Axis Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Axis Midcap | Kotak Multi Cap | UTI Value | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 44% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 37% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.36% points | 1.62% points | 0.79% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 80% | not measured | 47% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | not known | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | 6.9% | 4.2% | −4.1% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 17.1% | 17.3% | 12.1% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 13.5% | — | 11.0% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −19.5% | −21.0% | −17.2% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹32,454 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 5.9 yrs | — | 12 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 91 · 30% | none disclosed | 71 · 41% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.