Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Axis Multicap | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Axis Multicap share 17% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Value share 15% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Axis Multicap share 31% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Value share 45% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Axis Multicap share 26% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Axis MulticapMulti Cap | Axis Multicap and Tata Value share 17% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and HDFC Large Cap share 26% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Multicap and Nippon India Value share 26% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Axis Multicap share 26% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Tata Value share 15% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Axis Multicap share 31% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap | HDFC Large Cap | Axis Multicap | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 100% of 22 | 93% of 109 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.06% points | 0.70% points | 1.45% points | 0.82% points | 1.07% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 53% | 45% | 96% | 82% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | not known | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | −3.3% | −3.2% | 9.8% | −2.8% | 5.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 8.6% | 9.1% | 20.0% | 14.0% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 7.8% | 10.6% | — | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −15.8% | −16.4% | −18.1% | −17.6% | −18.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹9,775 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 12 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 76 · 48% | 50 · 53% | 114 · 23% | 94 · 36% | 80 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.