Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Kotak Mid Cap | HDFC Large Cap | SBI Large Cap | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and SBI Large Cap share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and SBI Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | HDFC Large Cap and SBI Large Cap share 46% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios |
| SBI Large CapLarge Cap | SBI Large Cap and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | SBI Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | SBI Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 46% of their portfolios | itself | SBI Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | SBI Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 33% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and SBI Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI Large Cap share 33% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Large Cap Fund and SBI Large Cap Fund share 46% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Kotak Mid Cap | HDFC Large Cap | SBI Large Cap | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 45% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.44% points | 0.70% points | 0.93% points | 1.17% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | not measured | 45% | 59% | 68% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | not known | Saurabh Pant · ≥ 3 mo | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | 4.8% | −3.2% | −1.6% | −1.1% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 18.1% | 9.1% | 9.2% | 10.4% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 16.8% | 10.6% | 9.0% | 12.8% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −20.9% | −16.4% | −15.4% | −17.9% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹55,417 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | — | 1.8 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | none disclosed | 50 · 53% | 57 · 47% | 68 · 47% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.