Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | HDFC Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 24% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 56% of their portfolios | itself | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 39% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and UTI Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Large Cap Fund and Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | HDFC Large Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 72% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 0.70% points | 1.38% points | 1.44% points | 1.17% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 45% | 40% | not measured | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | −3.2% | −4.0% | 4.8% | −1.1% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 9.1% | 10.4% | 18.1% | 10.4% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 10.6% | 9.0% | 16.8% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −16.4% | −14.8% | −20.9% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 4.8 yrs | — | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 50 · 53% | 63 · 47% | none disclosed | 68 · 47% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.