Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and HDFC Large Cap share 22% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 23% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Value share 15% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Tata Value share 22% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and HDFC Value share 39% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Tata Value share 23% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Value share 43% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios | itself | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 43% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Value share 45% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Tata Value share 15% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 59% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 64% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 0.70% points | 1.01% points | 1.06% points | 1.17% points | 1.07% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 45% | 57% | 53% | 68% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | −3.2% | −4.7% | −3.3% | −1.1% | 5.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 9.1% | 11.1% | 8.6% | 10.4% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 10.6% | 12.8% | 7.8% | 12.8% | 13.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −16.4% | −15.4% | −15.8% | −17.9% | −18.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.1 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 50 · 53% | 69 · 45% | 76 · 48% | 68 · 47% | 80 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.