Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 16% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 7% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Tata Value share 16% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | itself | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Bandhan Value share 19% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and UTI Value share 26% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | UTI Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 26% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | Bandhan Value | UTI Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 40% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 37% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.03% points | 0.68% points | 1.17% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 108% | 41% | 68% | 47% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | 6.8% | −2.3% | −1.1% | −4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 15.9% | 8.4% | 10.4% | 12.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 15.0% | 4.9% | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −17.3% | −20.1% | −17.9% | −17.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 167 · 24% | 62 · 44% | 68 · 47% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.