Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | HDFC Small Cap | HSBC Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HSBC Value share 18% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HSBC Value share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Value share 20% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Small CapSmall Cap | HDFC Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Small Cap and HSBC Value share 8% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Tata Value share 18% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and HDFC Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 20% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HSBC Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 28% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | HDFC Small Cap | HSBC Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 0.86% points | 1.25% points | 1.12% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 52% | 46% | 75% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | 7.0% | −2.6% | 2.4% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 18.6% | 11.3% | 15.9% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 18.0% | 14.8% | — | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −19.9% | −22.6% | −19.6% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹42,162 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 14 yrs | 2.4 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 105 · 25% | 87 · 35% | 86 · 32% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.