Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | SBI MIDCAP | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Multi Cap | HDFC Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 12% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 12% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Bandhan Value share 7% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and HDFC Multi Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and SBI MIDCAP share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 36% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Multi CapMulti Cap | HDFC Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 6% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 23% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 36% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and HDFC Multi Cap Fund share 36% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | SBI MIDCAP | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Multi Cap | HDFC Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 50% of 109 | 73% of 22 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.03% points | 1.09% points | 1.17% points | 0.84% points | 1.30% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 108% | 80% | 68% | 66% | 79% |
| Run by P7 | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | 3.8% | −1.1% | −1.4% | −2.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 15.9% | 11.0% | 10.4% | 13.5% | 12.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 15.0% | 13.5% | 12.8% | 16.4% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.3% | −17.9% | −17.9% | −18.6% | −20.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹20,765 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 14 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 167 · 24% | 64 · 28% | 68 · 47% | 123 · 29% | 127 · 23% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.