Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Axis Large Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Quant Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Quant Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 8% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Axis Large Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Quant Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Axis Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Quant Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Axis Large Cap share 54% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Multi Cap share 36% of their portfolios |
| Axis Large CapLarge Cap | Axis Large Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Axis Large Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Axis Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 54% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 34% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 36% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Axis Large Cap share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Axis Large Cap Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Axis Large Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Large Cap | Large Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 90% of 109 | 47% of 109 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% points | 1.62% points | 0.81% points | 1.21% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 88% | not measured | 45% | 73% | 66% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | not known | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.9% | 4.2% | −5.3% | −3.2% | −1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.5% | 17.3% | 10.6% | 9.2% | 13.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.7% | — | 10.9% | 5.8% | 16.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −25.3% | −21.0% | −15.4% | −15.5% | −18.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹80,822 Cr | ₹30,395 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | — | 13 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 74 · 53% | none disclosed | 93 · 47% | 49 · 48% | 123 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.