Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 12% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 19% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
2 of these funds have no portfolio on file, so their rows are blank rather than zero — an absence in the data here, not a finding about the funds.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Large Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 87% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 73% of 109 | 83% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.86% points | 1.03% points | 1.62% points | 1.01% points | 1.44% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 52% | 108% | not measured | 57% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 7.0% | 6.8% | 4.2% | −4.7% | 4.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.6% | 15.9% | 17.3% | 11.1% | 18.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.0% | 15.0% | — | 12.8% | 16.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.9% | −17.3% | −21.0% | −15.4% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 11 yrs | — | 13 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 105 · 25% | 167 · 24% | none disclosed | 69 · 45% | none disclosed |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.