Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
6 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Small Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | HSBC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | itself | Quant Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 2% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and HSBC Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and HDFC Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HSBC Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | HDFC Large Cap and Quant Small Cap share 2% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and HSBC Small Cap share 0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 7% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and HSBC Small Cap share 21% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 8% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 5% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and HSBC Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| HSBC Small CapSmall Cap | HSBC Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios | HSBC Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 3% of their portfolios | HSBC Small Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 0% of their portfolios | HSBC Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 21% of their portfolios | HSBC Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and HDFC Large Cap Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Small Cap | Bandhan Value | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | HSBC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Value | Large Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 69% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 51% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 0% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 1.17% points | 0.70% points | 1.10% points | 2.00% points | 1.21% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 75% | 68% | 45% | 68% | 68% | 83% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 6.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 12.7% | −1.1% | −3.2% | 8.9% | 10.4% | 12.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.5% | 10.4% | 9.1% | 16.1% | 25.3% | 15.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.2% | 12.8% | 10.6% | 19.0% | 20.0% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.4% | −17.9% | −16.4% | −24.2% | −22.8% | −27.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹19,076 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.5 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 1.8 yrs | 14 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 120 · 43% | 68 · 47% | 50 · 53% | 257 · 16% | 265 · 30% | 115 · 20% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.